New Mexico Governor Sued Over Gun Violence Order!
New Mexico Governor, Lujan Grisham, issued an order to stop Gun Violence statewide plan after a tragic killing of an 11 year old. Find more about this HERE.
Let’s find out more what is happening as the Gun Advocates sued governer Lujan.
The Challenge to Emergency Orders
In a riveting legal showdown that has grabbed the nation’s attention, the National Association for Gun Rights has taken bold action by filing a lawsuit against New Mexico’s Democratic Governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham, and the state’s Department of Health Secretary, Patrick Allen.
This legal battle has emerged in response to the emergency orders issued by Governor Grisham, wherein she deemed gun violence a public health crisis.
These orders led to the temporary suspension of open and concealed carry laws in specific cities and counties, a decision justified by crime statistics. It’s a clash that not only pits constitutional rights against public safety but also raises questions about the boundaries of executive power during times of crisis.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have profound implications for the ongoing debate surrounding gun control measures and the preservation of individual freedoms.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on New Mexico, awaiting a verdict that could potentially reshape the landscape of gun rights in America.
Why did Emergency Orders take place?
In the wake of several heart-wrenching tragedies, Governor Lujan Grisham issued a series of emergency orders that aimed to confront the escalating problem of gun violence in our state.
The pain and loss experienced by our communities after the tragic shooting deaths of three innocent children between July and September, coupled with the shock of two mass shootings, compelled swift action.
However, these measures have not come without their fair share of controversy and legal battles.
The Governor’s commitment to public safety has ignited a passionate debate about the balance between protecting lives and upholding our Second Amendment rights.
The discourse surrounding these orders underscores the complex and deeply rooted issues we face as a society.
Second Amendment Under Scrutiny
In the legal battle, the National Association for Gun Rights has taken center stage, vehemently arguing that emergency orders issued in various states pose a direct threat to the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which safeguards the right to bear arms.
Their core argument revolves around the notion that these emergency measures, often dubbed “Carry Prohibitions,” fail to align with any historical tradition of firearm regulation within the nation.
The plaintiffs insist that there is simply no precedent or historical context to support such restrictions.
Drawing strength from a pivotal 2022 Supreme Court decision that struck down a restrictive New York gun law prohibiting concealed carry outside the home, the plaintiffs firmly assert that these emergency orders blatantly infringe upon the fundamental Second Amendment rights of American citizens.
As this legal battle unfolds, it raises crucial questions about the balance between public safety and individual liberties, leaving us to ponder the intricacies of the Second Amendment’s application in our ever-changing society.
Seeking Legal Relief
In a bold legal maneuver, the plaintiffs have taken a decisive step in their pursuit of justice. Their plea to the court seeks a powerful remedy—an injunction that could potentially halt the enforcement of emergency orders.
This legal gambit is not merely a procedural formality; it represents a crucial turning point in the ongoing battle against these controversial measures.
By requesting an injunction, the plaintiffs aim to put a temporary brake on the enforcement of emergency orders, ensuring that citizens’ rights and freedoms are safeguarded during the legal showdown.
It’s a strategic move that underscores the significance of this case and the determination of those involved to uphold the principles of justice.
As the courtroom drama unfolds, the outcome of this request will undoubtedly be watched with bated breath.
It’s a reminder that the legal system plays a pivotal role in our society, offering recourse to those who seek to challenge government actions they believe to be unjust.
This legal battle may set a precedent, shaping the future course of similar disputes. The fight for justice marches on, one legal step at a time.
A Second Legal Challenge
Interestingly, another lawsuit filed on the same day also targets Governor Lujan Grisham, Secretary Allen, Department of Public Safety Secretary Jason Bowie, and State Police Chief W. Troy Weisler.
Filed by Bernalillo County resident Randy Donk and the Gun Owners of America, this separate legal action likens the executive order and public health emergency declaration to “martial law.”
It contends that these measures amount to a suspension of constitutional rights and also seeks immediate and long-term injunctions against their enforcement.
Governor’s Defiant Response
Caroline Sweeney, a spokesperson for Governor Lujan Grisham, issued a resolute statement in response to the legal challenges.
Sweeney stated that the governor is fully prepared to defend her decision, emphasizing that gun violence represents a pressing public health emergency in the state. The statement further underscores the belief that extraordinary measures are necessary to protect the lives of New Mexicans.
Temporary Ban and Restrictions
Notably, Governor Lujan Grisham previously issued a statewide enforcement plan, which included a 30-day suspension of open and concealed carry laws in Albuquerque and surrounding Bernalillo County.
This temporary ban restricts the carrying of firearms on public property within those areas, with specific exceptions.
Individuals holding carry permits are still permitted to possess their weapons on private property such as gun ranges and gun stores, provided the firearm is transported securely.
Additionally, the order prohibits firearms on state property, including state buildings, schools, parks, and other locations where children gather.
Licensed firearm dealers will also face increased scrutiny under the order, with monthly inspections by New Mexico’s Regulation and Licensing Division to ensure compliance with sales and storage regulations.
The Ongoing Debate
The legal battle brewing in New Mexico serves as a microcosm of the broader debate surrounding gun rights and gun control in the United States.
As this dispute unfolds in the courts, it will undoubtedly draw national attention, and its outcome could have far-reaching implications for how states address the complex issue of gun violence while respecting constitutional rights.
